![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Dec. 2nd, 2004
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Surprisingly sparse
Dec. 2nd, 2004 10:39 amFor reasons that baffle even myself I got to thinking about a really silly set theory problem. I was trying to figure out pairs of sets of countries with no shared "major sports".
For the purposes of the exercise, a sport is a major sport in country x if either (a) it is played by a reasonable proportion of the population, or (b) the national team plays in the top level of international competition or (c) it is popular enough as a spectator sport to feature regularly on network TV.
Similarly, a sport is a major sport if it qualifies as a major sport in country x for at least six values of x.
Thus NFL football is a major sport in the USA but not a major sport.
So far the only mutually exclusive pair relationships I can think of are:
Ice Hockey and/or Baseball vs. Field Hockey and/or Cricket
Any more for any more?
ETA: I realise I am being slightly sloppy with notation. When I say, for example, polo, I am using it as shortghand for the set of countries where polo is a major sport
For the purposes of the exercise, a sport is a major sport in country x if either (a) it is played by a reasonable proportion of the population, or (b) the national team plays in the top level of international competition or (c) it is popular enough as a spectator sport to feature regularly on network TV.
Similarly, a sport is a major sport if it qualifies as a major sport in country x for at least six values of x.
Thus NFL football is a major sport in the USA but not a major sport.
So far the only mutually exclusive pair relationships I can think of are:
Ice Hockey and/or Baseball vs. Field Hockey and/or Cricket
Any more for any more?
ETA: I realise I am being slightly sloppy with notation. When I say, for example, polo, I am using it as shortghand for the set of countries where polo is a major sport