Old Trafford - the grisly end
Aug. 15th, 2005 03:47 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
chickenfeetAlmost but not quite.
Fine batting by Ponting and Warne added to their earlier, equally skilful but less admirable, time wasting was just enough to get Australia the draw. I can't help feeling though that England choked. Vaughan's handling of his bowlers and his field settings were quite bizarre at times. Jones, despite being clearly the best of England's bowlers in the first innings was the sixth to be used in the second and had to wait until thirty overs had been bowled this morning before he got a second spell. When he came on he bowled beautifully and was very unlucky to get only one wicket. Who knows what might have happened if Vaughan had attacked more earlier in the day instead of persisting with a toothless Giles bowling to defensive fields?
In many ways the result is as bad as it could be, short of a defeat. The series is still all square but England will no doubt see the "almost win" as reason not to look at the composition of the side. As it is, the side is good but not quite good enough. It's the same disease that afflicts England's rugby selectors; pick a safe side that's good enough to perform adequately to well in the 6N and find excuses for why it gets stuffed against the SANZAR teams. Unfortunately beating the world champions takes more than that.
'
Fine batting by Ponting and Warne added to their earlier, equally skilful but less admirable, time wasting was just enough to get Australia the draw. I can't help feeling though that England choked. Vaughan's handling of his bowlers and his field settings were quite bizarre at times. Jones, despite being clearly the best of England's bowlers in the first innings was the sixth to be used in the second and had to wait until thirty overs had been bowled this morning before he got a second spell. When he came on he bowled beautifully and was very unlucky to get only one wicket. Who knows what might have happened if Vaughan had attacked more earlier in the day instead of persisting with a toothless Giles bowling to defensive fields?
In many ways the result is as bad as it could be, short of a defeat. The series is still all square but England will no doubt see the "almost win" as reason not to look at the composition of the side. As it is, the side is good but not quite good enough. It's the same disease that afflicts England's rugby selectors; pick a safe side that's good enough to perform adequately to well in the 6N and find excuses for why it gets stuffed against the SANZAR teams. Unfortunately beating the world champions takes more than that.
'
