Perspectives
Feb. 18th, 2004 03:45 pmCanada is an interesting place to watch the news from. We are of course obsessed with the minutiae of everything that happens in our neighbour to the south; from the primaries to Janet Jackson's tit, but our papers do a pretty good job of covering the rest of the world too. Our major papers reported Hutton, for example, in detail.
What I am finding interesting right now is that our government is caught up in the biggest financial scandal for decades and it seems to have hardly registered in the British press. You might imagine that when the governing party in an allied country with some odd historical ties loses 15 percentage points of its support over a weekend that it would be newsworthy. Apparently not.
Is this because EU membership has accustomed people to the idea that millions of dollars/francs whatever will be siphoned off from public funds to party coffers?
What I am finding interesting right now is that our government is caught up in the biggest financial scandal for decades and it seems to have hardly registered in the British press. You might imagine that when the governing party in an allied country with some odd historical ties loses 15 percentage points of its support over a weekend that it would be newsworthy. Apparently not.
Is this because EU membership has accustomed people to the idea that millions of dollars/francs whatever will be siphoned off from public funds to party coffers?
no subject
Date: 2004-02-18 01:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-18 01:43 pm (UTC)You might imagine that when the governing party in an allied country with some odd historical ties loses 15 percentage points of its support over a weekend that it would be newsworthy
In general, Canada is simply not interesting enough from a UK or European perspective unless something really, truly shocking or weird happens. It's been that way for a long, long time.
And the EU has nothing on the Liberals in terms of throwing good money after bad.
no subject
Date: 2004-02-18 02:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-18 04:55 pm (UTC)Saying that, I have to admit that I'm not terribly interested. I avoid the news for the most part.
Re:
Date: 2004-02-19 05:58 am (UTC)http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3491905.stm
Re:
Date: 2004-02-19 06:51 pm (UTC)Misuse of funds? That's hardly news! :)
Re:
Date: 2004-02-19 06:58 pm (UTC)The former PM's wife's name is Aline, so I had to read that twice ... he was a great one for funnelling funds to his pals.
The worst thing you can say about the current guy is that he's boring.
Re:
Date: 2004-02-19 07:06 pm (UTC)The worst thing you can say about the current guy is that he's boring.
Compared to many traits, being boring is pretty good for a politician.
Re:
Date: 2004-02-19 07:19 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2004-02-19 07:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-19 06:40 am (UTC)