Terminology question
Aug. 24th, 2004 09:48 amWhat adjective should one use to describe serious western music written to be performed primarily by trained musicians? I hate 'classical' because that can also be applied to the period between baroque and romantic and it seems singularly inapposite when applied to, say, Boulez. 'Serious' or 'art' music seems condescending to several other genres. So what is the answer?
no subject
Date: 2004-08-24 07:32 am (UTC)Interesting question that I'm still thinking about...
no subject
Date: 2004-08-24 07:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-24 10:31 am (UTC)I do hope you're not expecting me to provide you with it though. ;-)
no subject
Date: 2004-08-24 07:47 am (UTC)TCH
no subject
Date: 2004-08-24 10:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-24 10:29 am (UTC)Other than that, though, I can't offer you any suggestions. I'm sorry!
no subject
Date: 2004-08-24 06:40 pm (UTC)I've also tried orchestral, art music, etc. But I wouldn't dare use 'serious' because people are also serious about heavy metal, filk, etc.
This calls for a neologism! But it would be easier to get traction for a term from another language (German, Russian, Swedish, French, Hungarian, ... the serious, complex, precise languages of classical composers from non-classical eras)
no subject
Date: 2004-08-25 03:52 am (UTC)Art music? No. No no no no no.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-25 09:44 am (UTC)