chickenfeet: (death)
[personal profile] chickenfeet
Could this be an attempt to switch the story from "how the police screwed up" to "how the media reported the story"?

Date: 2005-08-17 08:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] itchyfidget.livejournal.com
Yeah, that's it. It was all misreported.

Date: 2005-08-17 11:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jen-c-w.livejournal.com
hmm. I sort of see what you mean, but think it unlikely. I feel the plod come out worse from it than the perceived benefit to govt of getting a reaction of "the media are useless, see can't believe what you read in the papers". More likely someone fancied a quick buck - sometimes the simple explanations are right..

Date: 2005-08-17 11:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chickenfeet2003.livejournal.com
You are probably right but I wondered whether the tack was going to be "see how the pinko terrorist loving treasonable meeja attack our brave boys in blue"

Date: 2005-08-17 11:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brelson.livejournal.com
I doubt it - the media was generally supportive of the police action and gave every impression of embracing the "if he's foreign and running, shoot him" style of policing that Ian Blair was unashamedly evangelising the week after the murder. If this new version of events is correct, the police - Ian Blair in particular - have the most to lose now (not counting the de Menezes family, whose loss was acute, tragic, utterly needless and perpetrated, it would seem, by morons).

Date: 2005-08-17 01:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jen-c-w.livejournal.com
oh, I see, you mean - "look the nasty papers are getting at our brave (might have been a bit hasty like, but were only trying to protect Die Volk) coppers, by publishing this (even if it's true it's not in the public interest) Now we're not going to give them anything, and you should ignore everything they say, they just tear people down who are trying to do a good job?" Yup, it's possible - storing up points for later on you mean? What a worrying thought, just what civil liberty is bliar going to attack next?

Date: 2005-08-17 01:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chickenfeet2003.livejournal.com
That was my train of thought. I now doubt it though. The fact that the gov/met are stonewalling suggests that they have really been caught by surprise. I mean since when did Blair maintain "a principled silence"?

Date: 2005-08-17 01:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jen-c-w.livejournal.com
haha, that's brilliant. Sorry, any sentece with the use of the word Blair and principled amuses me greatly. Shame you weren't so avowedly taciturn when the question of David Kelly's name came up hey Tony?

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 23 4 5 6 7
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 9th, 2025 12:57 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios