A question of LJ ethics
Sep. 5th, 2005 07:56 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
chickenfeetI'd appreciate my esteemed friends comments on this.
Person X makes a f-locked post.
Person Y (in this case me) responds causing offence to person X though third party enquiries suggest it's no more than me being my, admittedly, robust self.
Person X deletes me from friends list but leaves the f-locked post and my response up. This allows allows random ad hominem attacks on person Y (me) but blocks me from replying. Polite back channel enquiries are ignored.
Is this ethical?
Person X makes a f-locked post.
Person Y (in this case me) responds causing offence to person X though third party enquiries suggest it's no more than me being my, admittedly, robust self.
Person X deletes me from friends list but leaves the f-locked post and my response up. This allows allows random ad hominem attacks on person Y (me) but blocks me from replying. Polite back channel enquiries are ignored.
Is this ethical?
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2005-09-06 12:52 am (UTC)am wary of anyone too easily offended (likely because I seem to cause offence more often than I should but lighten up people)...
am also unusuallty annoyed these days w/excessive drama and silliness... totally unnecessary (we are adults, are we not? if you don't like something someone says then deal w/it - we're not junior high)...
am also drunk right now so even less tolerant of excessive b.s. which seems to breed all too rapidly everywhere...