A question of LJ ethics
Sep. 5th, 2005 07:56 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
chickenfeetI'd appreciate my esteemed friends comments on this.
Person X makes a f-locked post.
Person Y (in this case me) responds causing offence to person X though third party enquiries suggest it's no more than me being my, admittedly, robust self.
Person X deletes me from friends list but leaves the f-locked post and my response up. This allows allows random ad hominem attacks on person Y (me) but blocks me from replying. Polite back channel enquiries are ignored.
Is this ethical?
Person X makes a f-locked post.
Person Y (in this case me) responds causing offence to person X though third party enquiries suggest it's no more than me being my, admittedly, robust self.
Person X deletes me from friends list but leaves the f-locked post and my response up. This allows allows random ad hominem attacks on person Y (me) but blocks me from replying. Polite back channel enquiries are ignored.
Is this ethical?
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2005-09-06 01:18 am (UTC)On the one hand, I really don't like deleting comments, but on the other, if I had a problem with someone, I'd try and deal with them to their face rather than behind their back. I'd particularly try not to encourage others to wade in. That might just be me though.
I hope I'm making sense, it's past my bedtime...