chickenfeet: (Default)
[personal profile] chickenfeet
Despite reading mathematics at university many moons ago, I never formally studied quantum mechanics or relativity. This was because I was much stronger in the general areas of probability theory and statistics than in physical methods so I chose my options accordingly. I still try and catch up with what's going on in the world of theoretical physics from time to time but though I think I have a decent heuristic grasp of quantum mechanics and special relativity (i.e. I think I 'get' what the mathematics mean though I couldn't actually work the math) until yesterday I really struggled with general relativity. So yesterday I was poking around some nifty stuff on the Caltech website and I suddenly realised where I had been going wrong. The fourth dimension of the standard space-time geometry isn't t as my brain had been insisting all these years (which is ironic as I know Maxwell's equations perfectly well) but ct. Suddenly space-time as a geometry makes sense and the effect of the distribution of mass-energy also falls into place. And it has only taken me just short of thirty years to figure this out!

Date: 2006-03-20 03:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pshtaku.livejournal.com
this definitely trumps my 3 years to get the wrong answer to the clockhands question!

Date: 2006-03-21 04:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] furious-g.livejournal.com
Hehe, and I know Paris read that post and had no idea what you were talking about ! Congrats though on the realization!

March 2026

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 910 11 12 13 14
15161718 19 2021
222324 2526 27 28
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 28th, 2026 08:55 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios