chickenfeet: (Default)
[personal profile] chickenfeet
Despite reading mathematics at university many moons ago, I never formally studied quantum mechanics or relativity. This was because I was much stronger in the general areas of probability theory and statistics than in physical methods so I chose my options accordingly. I still try and catch up with what's going on in the world of theoretical physics from time to time but though I think I have a decent heuristic grasp of quantum mechanics and special relativity (i.e. I think I 'get' what the mathematics mean though I couldn't actually work the math) until yesterday I really struggled with general relativity. So yesterday I was poking around some nifty stuff on the Caltech website and I suddenly realised where I had been going wrong. The fourth dimension of the standard space-time geometry isn't t as my brain had been insisting all these years (which is ironic as I know Maxwell's equations perfectly well) but ct. Suddenly space-time as a geometry makes sense and the effect of the distribution of mass-energy also falls into place. And it has only taken me just short of thirty years to figure this out!

Date: 2006-03-20 03:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pshtaku.livejournal.com
this definitely trumps my 3 years to get the wrong answer to the clockhands question!

Date: 2006-03-21 04:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] furious-g.livejournal.com
Hehe, and I know Paris read that post and had no idea what you were talking about ! Congrats though on the realization!

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  1234 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 1819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 19th, 2025 05:59 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios