Buffer force
Jul. 24th, 2006 07:24 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
It seems the latest idea for dealing with the situation in Lebanon is some sort of international force to do something in the south of the country. If I read code words like "robust" correctly the purpose is essentially to destroy Hezbollah and act as frontier guards for Israel. No doubt it will be sold to as a "peacekeeping force" for, presumably, the same value of "peace" that prevails in Afghanistan and Iraq.
The whole idea seems immensely problematic. No-one in the Islamic world (including most of the population of southern Lebanon) is going to buy this as anything other than an armed intervention in favour of Israel. It therefore seems reasonable to assume that any troops deployed will come under the same sort of attack as in Afghanistan and Iraq which isn't a particularly appealing prospect.
There is a major problem about where the troops might come from and under what command structure. The US (and presumably Israel) don't want a 'blue helmeted' force and the optics of a NATO led mission would be almost as bad as an American led one. Looking around too it's hard to see where the troops would come from. Americans and Brits are right out for obvious reasons. The Canadians and Australians are stretched way too thin already. Of the armed forces capable of deploying for such a mission and not guaranteed to make a complete balls of it that would appear to leave France, Germany, Sweden, Turkey, India and Japan. For various reasons it seems highly improbable that Sweden, Germany or Japan would be prepared to make more than a token commitment, if that. I guess the best bet, if there has to be an intervention force, would be a Franco-Turkish one, though how 'neutral' the Israelis would consider the French to be might pose issues. Ironically, the French would probably deploy the Legion for such a task which would result in a largely German force protecting Israel.
Looking at it more broadly, am I the only one who is concerned that the current reaction to any hot spot (or at least one where sufficiently white people are getting killed) is to send a polyglot expedition with weird command structures and an unclear mission? At least Palmerston had some idea of what he expected a gunboat to do.
The whole idea seems immensely problematic. No-one in the Islamic world (including most of the population of southern Lebanon) is going to buy this as anything other than an armed intervention in favour of Israel. It therefore seems reasonable to assume that any troops deployed will come under the same sort of attack as in Afghanistan and Iraq which isn't a particularly appealing prospect.
There is a major problem about where the troops might come from and under what command structure. The US (and presumably Israel) don't want a 'blue helmeted' force and the optics of a NATO led mission would be almost as bad as an American led one. Looking around too it's hard to see where the troops would come from. Americans and Brits are right out for obvious reasons. The Canadians and Australians are stretched way too thin already. Of the armed forces capable of deploying for such a mission and not guaranteed to make a complete balls of it that would appear to leave France, Germany, Sweden, Turkey, India and Japan. For various reasons it seems highly improbable that Sweden, Germany or Japan would be prepared to make more than a token commitment, if that. I guess the best bet, if there has to be an intervention force, would be a Franco-Turkish one, though how 'neutral' the Israelis would consider the French to be might pose issues. Ironically, the French would probably deploy the Legion for such a task which would result in a largely German force protecting Israel.
Looking at it more broadly, am I the only one who is concerned that the current reaction to any hot spot (or at least one where sufficiently white people are getting killed) is to send a polyglot expedition with weird command structures and an unclear mission? At least Palmerston had some idea of what he expected a gunboat to do.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-24 11:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-24 11:39 am (UTC)That is promising. The problem then becomes who, apart from the Saudis, have units one could trust not to make a hash of it.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-24 11:56 am (UTC)(But I think the Jordanians, in fact, have a decent military, and so do the Moroccans. In fact I know a prof at Kenitra War College who's pretty impressive, all the more so because he's one of M6s advisersafter having been jailed by H2.)
no subject
Date: 2006-07-24 12:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-24 12:45 pm (UTC)That's good news, I suppose. Considering how the Saudis repress the Shia in the kingdom (I think they actually hold a quiet record for destruction of Shia mosques in the region), I suppose even the more religiously-bent would still object to Hezbollah. I was very unimpressed by the little I've seen of their military, but admittedly they weren't about to show off to a female journalist, and the guy I spoke to made it absolutely clear what he thought of infidel women in the professions. The Gulf military are extremely dismissive of the Saudi, but OTOH everyone hates the Saudis in the Gulf, so I suppose you can't much trust them on that. What sort of clinched my opinion were the hilarious accounts by a French coach of trying to train the Saudis to play football, as a good insight to state of mind as regards effort & discipline. Mind you, it was a few years back, and their team did make it to the World Cup, so...
no subject
Date: 2006-07-24 12:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-24 11:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-24 12:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-24 01:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-24 01:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-24 01:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-24 06:05 pm (UTC)*runs*
no subject
Date: 2006-07-24 06:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-24 06:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-24 06:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-24 03:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-24 03:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-24 06:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-25 02:16 pm (UTC)The day approaches...