Sense of Indian geography

[chickenfeet]

I've posted more than once about my annoyance about politician x having no sense of history. This post is about my annoyance at having a limited sense of geography. I'm a map fiend. I learned to read OS maps at an early age, in part at least because, as 11 year olds, my school used to bus us into the Herts/Essex countryside and dump us with an OS map, a compass and a set of cryptic instructions on how to get home. As the years have gone by I've acquired a good sense of the geography of most of Europe and North America. If I read a narrative of the battle of Stalingrad I don't need to get an atlas out to understand the importance of the bridges over the Don at Kalach. Now, though I'm flummoxed. The atlases we own and the various on-line sources readily available provide a really crappy view of the geography of India. Sure, I can figure out the real broad brush stroke stuff but that's as far as it goes. I'm trying to figure out the strategic logic of Wellesley's campaign against the Mahratta confederacy and I am severely geographically challenged. Where does one find decent maps of India that give some idea of what the terrain is actually like?

Comments

[chickenfeet2003.livejournal.com]

Thanks. I'm still going to try and find something with more detail but those got me further than the Rand-McNally World Atlas.