chickenfeet: (widmerpool)
[personal profile] chickenfeet
According to the Globe and Mail, Canada is proposing to deploy a squadron of Leopard tanks to Afghanistan, This is really odd. Neither the British or the Americans, who have lots of quite capable MBT units have chosen to deploy them so why would the Canadians, whose tanks*, despite a few upgrades, are so obsolete that they don't even compete in NATO gunnery competitions, and despite the logistical nightmare of getting these beasts to Afghanistan doing this?

*The Leopards were bought second hand from the Bundeswehr in the 1980s. They are basically 1960s technology with some upgrades to night sights and the like. In essence they are the same generation of technology as the burnt out Russian tanks that litter the countryside in Afghanistan.

Well...

Date: 2006-09-11 12:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fearsclave.livejournal.com
Logistical issues aside, when the other side has no tanks, even a few obsolete tanks are a huge advantage to your side... But seriously, yes, that does strike me as being really, really odd.

Re: Well...

Date: 2006-09-11 01:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chickenfeet2003.livejournal.com
even a few obsolete tanks are a huge advantage to your side..

It didn't do the Russians much good. I also think the Glob is quite wrong about the relevant vulnerability of the Leopard and the LAV3. AFAIK the LAV3 has slatted armour which is rather effective against shaped charge weapons while the Leopard is good old armour plate; good against kinetic rounds but that's hardly a threat!

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     1 23
4 5 6 7 8 910
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 2324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 23rd, 2025 06:57 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios