chickenfeet: (death)
[personal profile] chickenfeet
Almost but not quite.

Fine batting by Ponting and Warne added to their earlier, equally skilful but less admirable, time wasting was just enough to get Australia the draw. I can't help feeling though that England choked. Vaughan's handling of his bowlers and his field settings were quite bizarre at times. Jones, despite being clearly the best of England's bowlers in the first innings was the sixth to be used in the second and had to wait until thirty overs had been bowled this morning before he got a second spell. When he came on he bowled beautifully and was very unlucky to get only one wicket. Who knows what might have happened if Vaughan had attacked more earlier in the day instead of persisting with a toothless Giles bowling to defensive fields?

In many ways the result is as bad as it could be, short of a defeat. The series is still all square but England will no doubt see the "almost win" as reason not to look at the composition of the side. As it is, the side is good but not quite good enough. It's the same disease that afflicts England's rugby selectors; pick a safe side that's good enough to perform adequately to well in the 6N and find excuses for why it gets stuffed against the SANZAR teams. Unfortunately beating the world champions takes more than that.
'

Date: 2005-08-16 02:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kaet.livejournal.com
I didn't see much today, owing to having to go ot work, and not having a radio there. Though I did find urgent business in the nearest sports pub for the last three overs. Defensive how? Lots deep, and not enough in the slips?

Date: 2005-08-16 11:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jen-c-w.livejournal.com
at one point, he had 1 (ONE) slip and no gulley. Two hours before the end of the game, desperately needing wickets. A fantastic delivery from poor little Si would have gone straight down second slip's throat. Boo, and indeed hiss.

Date: 2005-08-16 12:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chickenfeet2003.livejournal.com
Basically, yes

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 23 4 5 6 7
8 91011 12 13 14
15 16 17 18192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 19th, 2025 11:11 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios